Acreage: All Soybeans Planted

See the full report.

Soybean Area Planted and Harvested - States and United States: 2012 and 2013 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :--------------------------------------------------------------- : 2012 : 2013 : 2012 : 2013 1/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 acres : Alabama ........: 340 420 335 410 Arkansas .......: 3,200 3,400 3,160 3,350 Delaware .......: 170 160 168 158 Florida ........: 21 25 20 23 Georgia ........: 220 260 215 250 Illinois .......: 9,050 9,400 8,920 9,350 Indiana ........: 5,150 5,250 5,140 5,230 Iowa ...........: 9,350 9,500 9,300 9,430 Kansas .........: 4,000 3,950 3,810 3,890 Kentucky .......: 1,480 1,600 1,470 1,590 : Louisiana ......: 1,130 1,110 1,115 1,080 Maryland .......: 480 470 475 465 Michigan .......: 2,000 1,900 1,990 1,890 Minnesota ......: 7,050 6,800 6,990 6,720 Mississippi ....: 1,970 1,920 1,950 1,900 Missouri .......: 5,400 5,700 5,260 5,640 Nebraska .......: 5,050 4,800 4,990 4,750 New Jersey .....: 96 96 94 94 New York .......: 315 320 312 317 North Carolina .: 1,590 1,700 1,580 1,680 : North Dakota ...: 4,750 4,400 4,730 4,360 Ohio ...........: 4,600 4,550 4,580 4,530 Oklahoma .......: 420 450 260 405 Pennsylvania ...: 530 560 520 550 South Carolina .: 380 400 370 390 South Dakota ...: 4,750 4,800 4,710 4,750 Tennessee ......: 1,260 1,360 1,230 1,330 Texas ..........: 125 115 110 95 Virginia .......: 590 610 580 600 West Virginia ..: 21 22 20 21 Wisconsin ......: 1,710 1,680 1,700 1,670 : United States ..: 77,198 77,728 76,104 76,918 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Forecasted. Percent of Soybean Acreage Planted Following Another Harvested Crop - Selected States and United States: 2009-2013 [Data as obtained from area frame samples. These data do not represent official estimates of the Agricultural Statistics Board but provide raw data as obtained from survey respondents. The purpose of these data is to portray trends in soybean production practices] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State : 2009 : 2010 : 2011 : 2012 : 2013 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : percent : Alabama .......: 32 14 56 35 60 Arkansas ......: 10 5 12 13 16 Delaware ......: 62 23 64 60 70 Florida .......: (Z) (Z) (Z) (D) (D) Georgia .......: 54 19 29 33 68 Illinois ......: 6 2 4 5 7 Indiana .......: 4 2 3 2 4 Kansas ........: 5 3 7 12 13 Kentucky ......: 30 13 30 29 41 Louisiana .....: 8 10 18 9 19 : Maryland ......: 44 16 44 40 62 Mississippi ...: 4 3 14 12 17 Missouri ......: 10 4 10 8 11 New Jersey ....: 24 14 24 19 15 North Carolina : 33 26 47 55 61 Ohio ..........: 1 (Z) 1 (Z) 1 Oklahoma ......: 41 28 30 73 42 Pennsylvania ..: 10 10 16 24 12 South Carolina : 30 28 45 56 84 Tennessee .....: 25 17 20 31 35 : Texas .........: 27 1 (Z) (Z) (Z) Virginia ......: 30 24 48 34 45 West Virginia .: (Z) (Z) 50 (Z) 11 : United States .: 6 3 6 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (Z) Less than half of the unit shown. See the full report.



…………………………

Coverage, Analysis of the June 28 USDA Reports
See all of the data, coverage and analysis of the Acreage and Grain Stocks reports.

%%RELATED_CONTENT%%

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Paul Neiffer details how the program deadline being extended to August 12, 2026, Stage 2 means farmers will continue to receive funds as USDA updates its database.
USDA forecasts historic wheat lows and record soybean gains amid drought, trade tensions, and rising input costs for the 2026/27 season.
As the federal government settles with Agri Stats over data-sharing, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Secretary Brooke Rollins launch a high-stakes investigation into beef market concentration and potential price-fixing.
Read Next
As producers navigate financial strain and D.C. disconnect, realities such as steep input costs, trade frustrations and E15 limbo are becoming decisive factors shaping the rural vote.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App