Farmers Reality Check Carbon Markets

We asked farmers what was their biggest reason they would choose NOT to participate in a carbon market. Here’s what they said.

Carbon
Carbon
(Farm Journal)

Carbon markets have often been described as the Wild West. What do farmers want to know before they make a decision to sign on the dotted line? In a March Farm Journal Pulse Poll, we asked:

“What is the biggest reason why you would NOT participate in a carbon market?”

Here’s how respondents answered:

15% Payment not worth the effort

9% Carbon markets aren’t developed enough

7% Not enough benefit for farmers

5% Don’t want to share my data

64% I need more information I can trust

In the recent Farm Country Update, “The Three Biggest Trends in Carbon Markets,” Oregon livestock producer Kelley Delpit said producers should ask themselves these questions to make a decision.

• What’s your motivation entering into carbon markets and transitioning to regenerative practices?

• What benefits do you hope to accrue? Is it financial, improving soil health, improving livestock weights or another metric?

• How are you prepared to adapt your existing practices to implement regenerative practices?

• What local support network exists—such as state and federal agencies, local NGOs, universities, and other producers—to help guide you through your transition?

Now it’s your turn to sound off!

What questions do you have about carbon markets?

Would you sign up for a carbon program?

Tell us your thoughts in the comments below!

Read more:

Bayer Says Farmers Using Conservation Practices Since 2012 Might Qualify For Its 2021-22 Carbon Program

3 Webinars to Learn More About Carbon Markets

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Iowa State research reveals PI 88788 resistance is losing effectiveness at 2% per year, with yield losses potentially reaching 9 bushels per acre by decade’s end if management practices are unchanged.
NASDA and the National Agricultural Law Center say a new project tracking both Chapter 11 and Chapter 12 filings offers a more complete view of agricultural bankruptcies — with California, Arkansas, Georgia and Iowa leading the initial dataset.
New research builds on growing state and federal scrutiny by asking what these laws could mean for land prices and productivity.
Read Next
Pro Farmer Crop Tour scouts discovered a corn crop that didn’t live up to expectations, with Pro Farmer pegging the national yield at 173.2 bu. per acre, well below USDA’s 180.7 current estimate.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App