EPA Details its Reason for Denying 26 Small Refinery Exemption Requests

Under the Clean Air Act, those affected by this decision have the right to request a judicial review with the US Court of Appeals within 60 days of the notice’s Federal Register publication.

Ethanol Plant at Corn Harvest, Lindsey Pound
Ethanol Plant at Corn Harvest, Lindsey Pound
(Lindsey Pound)

EPA issued a notice detailing the reasons for rejecting 26 small refinery exemptions. These exemptions relate to the obligations these refineries have to blend biofuels with conventional fuel under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The exemption requires small refineries to prove that adhering to the standard would lead to ‘disproportionate economic hardship’.

The rationale for the July rejections follows the precedent set by similar decisions made in April and June 2022.


Related story: EPA Moves to Deny 26 Small Refinery Exemption Requests


In their investigation, the EPA found that all refineries faced equivalent costs when obtaining Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs)—which serve as proof of complying with the RFS—irrespective of whether they procure them by blending renewable fuels or buying them on the open market.

The market price for fuels rises to accommodate the RIN cost, much like it would due to higher crude prices. The end effect is that these obligated parties can recoup their expenditure on RINs through the market price of the fuel they produce.

This process is universal, and the EPA clarifies there is no disproportionate cost for any party, including small refineries, as the costs are recovered in the market price.


Related story: The Countdown is on for EPA to Revise WOTUS


Under the Clean Air Act, those affected by this decision have the right to request a judicial review with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit within 60 days of the notice’s Federal Register publication. Several of the small refiners involved have declared their intention to lodge such petitions.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
The May Farm Journal Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor reveals growing concern over farm profitability, rising debt costs and long-term financial stress, with economists saying many operations may need significant restructuring to remain viable.
The company commits to a seven-year ban on restrictive provisions to foster competition in the corn and soybean markets. The settlement highlights a deepening partnership between federal antitrust regulators and agricultural authorities.

ASA says it fully supports year-round E15 ethanol but says social media backlash stems from confusion over SREs in House bill language as the measure heads to a tougher Senate fight.
Read Next
A two-pass boron strategy at bloom and pod set shows consistent yield payoffs across the Corn Belt, though agronomists warn the line between benefit and toxicity can be narrow.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App