John Phipps: China’s Zero-Covid Policy Isn’t New, It Actually Has a Gruesome Precedent

The zero-Covid strategy by the Chinese government is slowing their economy. In a rare admission, officials have lowered their GDP growth estimate, almost totally based on cities that aren’t working, especially ports.

The zero-Covid strategy by the Chinese government is slowing their economy. In a rare admission, officials have lowered their GDP growth estimate significantly, almost totally based on cities that aren’t working, especially ports.

This approach to contain the virus has been controversial with epidemiologists and doctors, and while seeming to be effective early in the pandemic, isolating cities has proven very hard and costly. Coupled with the lower effectiveness of Chinese vaccines and government refusal to use Western mNRA versions, zero-Covid shows little hope for improving their economic and pubic health future.

When it was first announced at the beginning of the pandemic, I was struck by how draconian and difficult to administer this policy was.

Recently I discovered such absolute isolation has a gruesome precedent. During the Great Leap Forward in 1958-62, China collectivized agriculture with truly disastrous results. Not only did production plummet as peasants were herded into collectives, but Mao Zedong insisted on continuing to export badly needed grain to keep up appearances of success. Of course, party officials were reporting grossly inflated harvest numbers to meet impossible goals demanded by the government.

Over that time historians have estimated 20-30 million Chinese starved, making it the largest man-made famine in history. Recent releases of local records have many historians raising that figure as high as 50 million unnecessary deaths. But medical experts have been puzzled why that famished population did not experience widespread plagues and diseases due to their weakened condition. The reason was what we are seeing now – immediate and total isolation of populations reporting such diseases.

This dictatorial approach is a tactic still in living memory for China, and as devastating as it was and is, may not be enough for Covid. Unlike in the 60’s however, China’s harsh treatment of its own people will have a substantial impact on the global economy as it will provide one-fifth, the largest share of global economic growth in the next 5 years.

With a million lives lost here in the U.S., we have our own sorry Covid history, but China’s on-going difficulty could soon spill into their politics. Watch the subtle and rare public debate between Premier Li Keqiang and Xi Jinping for clues.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Grains recovered off the lows after USTR Jamieson Greer stated significant progress had been made with China, including on ag trade, and details would be released on Monday.
Varilek says the slowdown in slaughter tied to ICE raids has hurt producers leverage in the cash market and it has been reflected in northern bids.
The market wants details, especially of what is included in the additional $17 billion prorated ag purchases China has promised, beyond soybeans
Read Next
After a growing season with multiple windstorms, tornadoes and 15" to 20" more rain than normal, Cody White in Maroa, Illinois is seeing corn bushels 25-30 bushels lower than last year.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App