Report Examines Alternatives for Controlling Problem Wolves

An environmental assessment of proposals for managing human-wolf conflicts and wolf depredation on livestock in Minnesota recommends that federal officials continue using a combination of lethal and non-lethal methods.

Yellowstone_Wolf_Winter
Yellowstone_Wolf_Winter
(AgWeb)

An environmental assessment of proposals for managing human-wolf conflicts and wolf depredation on livestock in Minnesota recommends that federal officials continue using a combination of lethal and non-lethal methods.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services program released the 225-page report for public comment Thursday.

The report also looks at the impacts of using only non-lethal methods for dealing with problem wolves, and of the federal agency withdrawing from wolf damage management in Minnesota.

It concludes that all three alternatives would not have significant adverse impacts on the state or regional wolf populations. The agency also expects no significant adverse impacts if federal protections are lifted and responsibility for managing wolves is returned to the Minnesota Department of Resources.

USDA Wildlife Services is taking comments through May 22.

___

Online:

The report is available and comments are being taken at: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=APHIS-2017-0023

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins says a multi-agency Trump administration effort will target fertilizer costs and boost U.S. production, with a major announcement expected yet this week.
EPA’s Set 2 RFS rule drives a surge in biofuel demand while also boosting feedstock markets. Matt Upmeyer with Montana Renewables explains why it could spark major gains for U.S. agriculture.
EPA is removing DEF sensor requirements to end costly equipment shutdowns and save farmers an estimated $4.4 billion annually.
Read Next
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App