U.S.-China Tariff Deal Excludes Soybeans, Leaving Market Disappointed

China cuts tariffs on $60 billion in goods but holds soybeans as leverage for future negotiations, disappointing markets.

Tariffs_U.S.-Trade-War-with-China.jpg
China tariffs
(MGN)

The United States and China provided joint meeting statements over the weekend announcing they reached a deal to cut tariffs on $30 billion of non-sensitive goods.

The two countries negotiated via the newly-activated Board of Trade with China cutting the 10 percent reciprocal tariffs on U.S. agricultural goods, with one notable exception affecting American farmers....soybeans.

Soybeans Left Behind

China did cut the 10-percent reciprocal tariffs on all agricultural goods, including wheat, corn, sorghum, meat, dairy, veg oils, and meal. However, whole soybeans were notably absent from the list. Analysts say China is holding soybeans as a leverage tool for future talks.

Additionally, China failed to provide details on the pro-rated $17 billion of additional agricultural goods purchases, which was a letdown for the market.

With soybeans still facing the 10-percent tariff, it makes it more expensive for Chinese private crushers to buy U.S. soybeans. That’s why the market was hoping for the tariff cut.

Impact on Private Buyers

Dan Basse, president of Ag Resource Company, explains the significance.

“It would bring back the private industry to be buyers here of U.S. soybeans. Today it’s all COFCO or Sinograin, it’s all state business. I think having some private buying would be very helpful.”

However, China separately committed to buying 25 million metric tons of U.S. beans annually through 2028 outside of the Board of Trade and without tariff cuts as a political maneuver.

State Buyers vs. Tariff Cuts

Arlan Suderman, chief commodities economist at StoneX, shed light on China’s strategy.

“Their state buyers can buy and crush the million metric tons of soybeans. There was no need for them to drop tariffs on that because they essentially don’t pay them. They saved that for a later negotiating tactic when they meet here in a couple of two or three months.”

However, analysts think that China’s state-owned entities have already bought over half of the 25 million metric tons of soybeans committed to and could purchase the balance.

“So it’s possible that China could buy all 25 million metric tons as a state and then auction off the supplies to the crushers, and it would give them control, but also give enough supply to the domestic market,” Basse adds.

Missing Details on Additional Purchases

The market was also disappointed by the lack of details on the pro-rated $17 billion of other agricultural purchases. But according to Basse, it’s bad business for China to provide a complete list.

“Yeah, it would cost them more money. That’s not how the Chinese work, nor would the U.S. government want them to work like that. So they set their pledges and then they let the Chinese choose the commodities and the purchases when they think best fits.”

Progress So Far

In addition to China buying over half the soybeans commitments, USTR Jamieson Greer confirmed China has bought nearly $4 billion of U.S. agricultural goods through the activated Board of Trade.

“And so the buying of the $4 billion is an indication that they’re still likely to spend another $10 billion,” Basse says.

Basse predicts China will buy cotton, forestry, aquaculture and meats. “But I’m also still very hopeful that China will buy between 5 and 12 million metric tons of U.S. corn and maybe upwards of a million metric tons of U.S. wheat.”

Market Frustration

The sum total could mean $1.2 billion of additional Chinese demand per week through 2026, depending on when it’s purchased. That timing remains another unknown that let the grain market traders down.

Joe Kooima of Kooima Kooima Varilek expressed his frustration.

“The administration just has that problem giving all the detail with it. I don’t know how many times that we have to kind of be fooled by that, but this is another time where it over-promised and then we just never get the list.”

The lack of clarity caused funds, who hold near record long positions in soybeans and corn, to sell on Monday.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Jerry Gulke, president of The Gulke Group, says grain prices need to go low enough to be competitive and stimulate demand.
Matt Bennett with AgMarket says soybeans made new lows for the move on Friday on fund selling and harvest. The question of how low prices go is dependent on how much of their long position they liquidate.
Joe Kooima of Kooima Kooima Varilek cattle futures have done a lot of heavy lifting the last three to four weeks with the stubborn cash market.
Read Next
Dozens of ag champions and producers will leave Washington following the midterm elections. History suggests their firsthand experience won’t be easily replaced — leaving rural America’s voice hanging in the balance.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App