Part 3. Accumulators: the good, the bad and the ugly

Bradbury_BIO_Photo
Bradbury_BIO_Photo
(Pack Creek Capital, LLC)

We are running a week long series on the OTC commodity structure known as the Accumulator. The trade is simple, yet very complex. Understanding the trade, its risks and when to avoid it will be the focus of the five part series.

Part 3. Zero Cost

What does ‘Zero Cost’ really cost?

Today we are going to talk about the term ‘Zero Cost’. All of the various forms of Accumulators mentioned so far are marketed as Zero Cost. They are not Zero Cost.

In the case of the Producer, you are ‘granting’ two strips of calls and receiving one strip of puts. The calls are worth more than the puts so you are giving up value on trade date. The value given up is the “edge” that goes to the broker/dealer. Edge put value = call value. This is solved for ‘Zero Cost’ by adjusting the put/call strike and the knock out barrier.

Sugar producer - SBH18 = 14.00 cents/lb. 98 trading days, daily accumulator at 14.80, knock out at 13.40. Actually looks fairly reasonable. Volatility is 25% compared to yesterday’s corn example with volatility at 16%. (We’ll cover this later)

This trade is priced at ‘Zero Cost’ using parameters common to most OTC dealers. I solved for ‘Zero’ using the above formula...so there’s an edge factored in for the house. Let’s be clear, the OTC dealer has to make money to run risk and pay its overheads. The amount of edge charged will vary greatly. The better skilled the traders are, the less edge needs to be charged. The more efficient the operation is, again, less edge needs to be charged.

Where does this edge or markup go?

It’s actually a mark to market loss against the client. The market value of the short calls is greater than the value of the long puts. This sometimes will be reflected the next day or sometimes dribbled into the P/L over a period of days or weeks. If you are trading on a credit line this will show up as line usage. If you are being fully margined this will push you closer to your threshold.

Tomorrow we’ll cover what these markups look like and the market factors that govern them.

Part 4 of the Accumulator Series tomorrow...

Pack Creek Capital constructs and manages hedge portfolios for companies in the grains, softs and energy markets. Contact mbradbury@packcreekcapital.com for more information.

www.packcreekcapital.com

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Oliver Sloup with Blue Line Futures says grain markets were trying to divorce from the war headlines and crude oil the last few weeks but now are right back trading with the energy moves.
Greg McBride of Allendale, says grains markets saw profit taking, also saw some farmer selling and hedge pressure on Tuesday.
Grain markets were all lower to start Tuesday seeing some routine profit taking after hitting new highs for the move and even some new contract highs in parts of the corn and soybean complex, according to Brady Huck with Empower Ag Trading.
Read Next
As the Strait closure enters its tenth week, supply chain gridlock and policy hurdles suggest high input costs will persist through the 2027 planting season, according to Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer with StoneX.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App