John Phipps: The Truth Behind the Numbers in Calculating Agriculture’s Trade Balance

John Phipps says positive or negative, any trade balance has dubious value, and only limited prediction power. Other than bragging rights, they mean little with no economic advantage for having a positive trade balance.

Viewer Darrell Boone in Wabash, Ind. has a question regarding the agricultural trade balance:

“For as long as I can remember, U.S. ag exports have been the bright and shining star of U.S. foreign trade--one of the few sectors to have a positive trade balance. Do you believe this forecast [negative ag trade balance] is correct, and if so, what happened and why? And what are the implications for farmers?”

First, and foremost, any trade balance has dubious value, and only limited prediction power. Other than bragging rights, they mean little. There is no trophy or economic advantage for having a positive trade balance. Some of our best economic periods have been times of significant negative trade balances. In fact, the absolute best way to reduce a trade deficit is have a recession and out a lot of people out of work. If it is important to you, notice the forecast is for it to rise again this year.

Second, this trade balance calculated in value – dollars – because you can’t use volume when you’re shipping everything from almonds to frozen beef. Some very high value products included in this trade balance have a big influence even though they don’t pop to mind for farmers. Spirits, beer and wine - which I’ve lumped together as liquor, may be the best example. We import lots of wine from Europe and increasingly places like Australia and New Zealand. The same for beer and spirits. The grain is mostly from Canada, and the oilseed include olive oil, which has become a very valuable import.

Finally, ag doesn’t seem to me to be the bright and shining star of U.S. trade. It’s our service sector – finance, insurance, education, etc. Its trade surplus is over 10 times the ag surplus. Since almost nobody in ag is aware of that fact, how much should we worry about the ag trade balance? Americans tend to focus on stuff, not other forms of trade, but almost 80% of our workers are employed in service industries. A negative balance of trade has long-term implications according to economists, but during my life it has indicated our consumers are working and buying, and our dollar is a highly desired form of wealth.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Rising input costs and geopolitical tensions drive growing pessimism among ag economists, though views differ on how the industry is being reshaped, according to the latest Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor.
With domestic production at record lows and private sector taking the lead, the island nation could leaning on U.S. producers more than ever.
Abolishing the Jones Act shouldn’t take a war or a disaster. Times are always tough—and the last thing Americans need is another bad law that makes it harder to make ends meet.
Read Next
As the Strait closure enters its tenth week, supply chain gridlock and policy hurdles suggest high input costs will persist through the 2027 planting season, according to Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer with StoneX.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App