USDA Doubles Down on Equipment Gains

USDA finally released guidance on equipment gains and farm AGI and it is not the answer we were looking for.

A standalone tax bill is unlikely this year, but major tax provisions might be attached to an omnibus spending bill that will likely occur before year-end.
A standalone tax bill is unlikely this year, but major tax provisions might be attached to an omnibus spending bill that will likely occur before year-end.
(Top Producer Magazine)

We had a feeling when we saw that ERP has already issued at least $6.4 billion of payments that USDA might not give us the result we wanted on equipment gains and that is the reality.

USDA just released updated guidance on the definitions of farm adjusted gross income (AGI). The bottom line is that farmers needs to have at least 66.66% of farm AGI to total AGI before they can include equipment gains. This will prevent many farmers from qualifying for increased payments.

Also, doing custom farming or harvesting services likely will have the same rule apply including providing seed to farmers. Many farmers sell seed as a sideline and AGI from providing these services will need to meet the same test. However, since this is AGI and not gross receipts, farmers can properly allocate expenses against this seed income to arrive at the correct amount of AGI.

The guidance also provides for situations where the entity may not be in existence for all three years. In those cases you can use AGI from predecessor entities. And it finally clarified that you use loss years in your AGI calculations. Several tax advisors thought loss years could be ignored and that is not the case.

Finally, the FSA indicated that AGI is calculated assuming the taxpayer filed a separate tax return for married couples. This generally helps farmers qualify for increased payments.

No changes were made regarding farmers with losses. In that case, as long as negative farm AGI is greater than total negative AGI by at least 75%, then the farmer qualifies.

Bottom line is that we did not get what we wanted on the equipment gain definition but the new Farm Bill could make changes to these definitions and the changes could be retroactive.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
From “Who owns my data?” to “Who’s training on it?”
Patrick Scates runs a service company, not a fertilizer company. His Shawneetown, Ill., terminal is targeted to go live Dec. 1 and is built to let wholesalers share the infrastructure bill.
CoBank projects the U.S. inland barge fleet shrinking about 17% by 2035 while USDA expects grain and oilseed exports to grow 9%. Operators who ship by river should plan for wider freight swings and a softer basis.
Read Next
First-time detections in Iowa and Alabama highlight the importance of accurate identification and proactive seed treatment strategies.

Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App