Research Results Paint a Picture of Robotic Milking on Midwest Dairies

The University of Minnesota has compiled important facts and figures that document the management styles, cow behavior and impact of robotic milking systems.

Cow_on_slatted_floor_coverage_-_9566-Edit_-_Copy
Cow_on_slatted_floor_coverage_-_9566-Edit_-_Copy
(DeLaval)

The University of Minnesota has compiled important facts and figures that document the management styles, cow behavior and impact of robotic milking systems.

It’s taken nearly two years, but University of Minnesota professor and Extension Dairy Specialist Marcia Endres and her team have compiled important facts and figures that document the impact of robotic milking systems (RMS) on U.S. dairies.

Endres and University of Minnesota colleague Jim Salfer have been conducting a study with 52 RMS farms in Minnesota and Wisconsin, where RMS systems are becoming more common. The researchers have collected on-farm housing and management information as well as daily data from the RMS computers for every cow.

“Along with describing what is happening on the farms, these data allow us to investigate factors associated with productive parameters and make some inferences about cow preferences and behavior,” said Endres during an Educational Seminar held Oct. 2 at World Dairy Expo.

Here is a summary of their findings:

• The dairies in the study average 2.6 RMS per farm and 1.4 robots per pen.

• The average number of freestalls per pen is 78.

• Fifty-eight percent of the barns were new, and 42% were retrofitted RMS units in existing barns.

• Forty-seven percent of the farms had automatic alley scrapers, 21% had slatted floors, 6% had bedded packs, and 26% scraped alleys manually.

• Seventy-five percent of the farms had exclusively free-flow cow traffic, 23% had exclusively guided-flow traffic, and 2% had both a free-flow and guided-flow cow traffic system in separate barns.

• Eighty-five percent of the farms had mechanical rotating cow brushes.

• Twenty-one percent of the farms had robotic feed pushers that pushed up the ration on a pre-determined schedule.

• Among the farms, 41.5% had mattresses, 26% sand, 13% waterbeds, 9.5% mattress and pasture, and 6% bedded pack.

• Average feed-bunk space was 20" per cow (out of a range of 10.2" to 42").

• The amount of concentrate fed in the RMS unit was 2 lb. to 25 lb. per day, depending on stage of lactation and type of system (free-flow systems average 2 lb. to 25 lb., guided-flow units average 2 lb. to 18 lb.).

• The Partial Mixed Ration (PMR) in the guided-flow systems was higher in energy and lower in NDF than in free-flow systems.

• In free-flow herds, the PMR was balanced for milk production levels of 10-30 lb. less than the herd’s average production.

• In guided-flow herds, the PMR was balanced for 9-20 lb. less than the average milk output.

• The researchers’ observations indicate that the “milk first” guided system is superior to the “feed first” free-flow system.

• There were herds with greater than 90 lb. per cow per day average with both free-flow and guided-flow systems.

You can reach Endres at miendres@umn.edu.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Stensland Family Farmers started their creamery to diversify their Northwest Iowa farm. Today they make over 80 flavors of ice cream at the farm and this time of year offer many holiday favorites and promotions.
At just 12 years old, Lexi Anderson was diagnosed with a rare heart disease. After a successful heart transplant in early 2024, she is back to showing dairy cattle and playing sports. Read how her determination — and a life-saving donor — gave her a second chance.
Monarch says its Autodrive technology is the first commercially available, fully autonomous feature in a driver-optional tractor.
Read Next
As the Strait closure enters its tenth week, supply chain gridlock and policy hurdles suggest high input costs will persist through the 2027 planting season, according to Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer with StoneX.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App