John Phipps: Why Vertical Farming Falls Short of the Hype

Enough vertical farms have been put into operation that early data can show how that idea is going to work out. John Phipps explains why the future of vertical farming isn’t promising.

Enough vertical farms have been put into operation that early data can offer a suggestion how that idea is going to work out.

Full disclosure: I never thought they made sense on any level other than futuristic fantasy. Like monorails. Multi-story buildings filled with produce in the heart of a city were such seductive images that believers bet technology could solve all the messy details like economics, thermodynamics, and agronomy if we just tried hard enough.

While there are some operational vertical farms, and this could be the ugly period most new technology struggles through, it appears the industry could go the way of other capital-eating startups. Vertical farming could be the Segway of agriculture, falling way short of the hype.

Some of the obstacles are obvious – energy use being top of the list. While LED cost and efficiency triggered the whole concept of growing stuff indoors by lowering growing-light costs, it’s still an order of magnitude more expensive than free solar outdoors in someplace like Arizona.

There were agronomic surprises like what happens when plants don’t experience wind and pollinators have no access. There was consumer uncertainty about the product – it’s clearly not organic, for instance. Nobody really has invented the standard building to prevent reinventing the wheel each time, making each structure a one-off expensive prototype.

The capital burn is enormous, and investors are running out of patience. Meanwhile, as the Finger Lakes region around Leamington, Ontario has demonstrated, properly located enormous horizontal greenhouses seem to have cleared many of these hurdles. To be sure, our dependence on concentrated growing areas like California or Texas is being tested by climate change and especially water availability, not to mention labor for some crops, but they keep groceries supplied - as long as the trucks run, of course.

As trade frictions ease and ingenious retailers find workarounds to import specific products, the vegetable business continues to be highly competitive and demand-, not supply-driven for the most part. The clincher for me was all I ever saw growing in those futuristic photos were greens. How much salad do we need anyway?

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Iowa State research reveals PI 88788 resistance is losing effectiveness at 2% per year, with yield losses potentially reaching 9 bushels per acre by decade’s end if management practices are unchanged.
NASDA and the National Agricultural Law Center say a new project tracking both Chapter 11 and Chapter 12 filings offers a more complete view of agricultural bankruptcies — with California, Arkansas, Georgia and Iowa leading the initial dataset.
New research builds on growing state and federal scrutiny by asking what these laws could mean for land prices and productivity.
Read Next
Saturated soils and high winds have downed corn and sparked disease risks for it and soybeans. Here is how to adjust your harvest equipment and strategy now to save yield.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App